Chapter 11: Fighting the Enemy Within
Alexander Fleming wasn’t simply some fortunate man who struck lucky. --[기호] it is very unlikely that Fleming was the first scientist whose bacterial cultures had become infected with mould.
The accidental
epigeneticist
Another happy
accident
Beyond coincidence
Cancer
biology 101
The epigenetic
frontier in cancer.
Stop looking
for miracles
No easy
wins
An uneasy
truce
Alexander Fleming wasn’t simply some fortunate man who
struck lucky. His insight wasn’t a fluke. --à it is
very unlikely that Fleming was the first scientist whose bacterial cultures had
become infected with mould.→→his achievement came in recognizing that something unusual had happened,
and appreciating its significance. Knowledge and training had prepared
Fleming’s mind to make the most of the chance event. He saw what probably many
others had seen before him but he thought
what nobody else had thought.
Epigenetic modifications control cell fate →→ its’s these processes
by which liver cells, for example, stay as live cells and don’t turn into ther
cell types. Cancer represents a
breaksown in normal control of cell fate, because liver cells stop being liver
cells and become cancer cells, suggesting that epigenetic regulation has become
abnormal in cancer. →→ we should therefore aim to de3velop drugs that influence
this epigenetic mis-regulation.
The accidental
epigeneticist
Peter Jones →→ a young South African scientist working with 5 -azacytidine.
5-azaxytidine it’s very similar in chemical structure to base C(cytidine)from
DNA and RNA. →→ it was assumed that 5-azacytidine
get added into DNA and RNA chains. Once there, it somehow disrupted normal copying
of DNA and transcription or activity of RNA. →→ if 5-azacytidine was interfering
with one or both of these processes, it would probably hamper the growth and divisions of the cancer cells. →→ one
morning, after the cells had been cultured with 5-azaxytindine for several
weeks, the researchers found that here was
a strange lumpy bit in one of the culture flask. To the naked eye, this initially
looked like a mold infection. Instead of discarding the flask. Peter Jones looked
at the lump more closely and discovered it
wasn’t stray bit of mold at all. It was a big mass of cells, which had
fused to form giant cells containing lots of nuclei. These were little muscle fiber.
→→→ cell lines treated with 5 azacytidine could also form other cell types, fat
cells, chondrocytes. →→ 5-azacytidine causes a reversion to a more pluripotent state. →→in interview for
university of southern California, Robert Stellwagen asked “have you thought of
DBA methylation? →→ Peter Jones admitted he not only hadn’t thought of it he
hadn’t even heard of it. →→ after that, Peter began to focus on DNA methylation
and in a very short time showed that this was indeed key to the effects of
5-azacytidine. 5-azacytidine inhibited
DNA methylation.
The methylation Cu-de-sac
DNMT1 binds at region where the DNA contains 5-azacytidine instead of the moral
cytidine, the DNMT1 becomes stuck there. This
marooned enzyme then sent to a different part of the cell and is broken down.→→→
because of this the total levels of DNMT1 enzyme in the cell fall. →→The
combination of this decrease in the amount of DNMT1, and the fact that
5-azacytidine can’t be methylated, means that the amount of DNA methylation in the cell keeps dropping. We’ll come
back in a little while to why this drop in
DNA methylation has an anti-cancer effect. [kp1]
Another happy
accident
Charlotte Friend DMSO(dimethyl
sulfoxide) had an odd effect on the cancer cells from a mouse model of
leukemia. →→ Ronald Breslow Paul Marks and
Richard Rifkind create a new set of chemicals, using the structure of DMSO →→→ after
many iterations, learning from each new and more complicated set of structures, created SAHA(suberoylanilide
hydroxamic acid)→→ was really effective at stopping growth and /or causing cell
death in cancer cell lines.
Trichostatin A or TSA→→→ known
to be able to stop cells proliferating. →→ when cells were treated with TSA, the levels of histone acetylation went up. This is because TSA was inhibiting the enzymes that remove acetyl groups from these
chromatin protein.
Fig 11.2 compare the structure for TSA and ASHA
TSA and SAHA was also an HDAC inhibitor. SAHA prevents HAAC enzymes from removing
acetyl groups from histone proteins, and as a result, the histones carry lots of acetyl groups.
Beyond coincidence
5-azacytidine and SAHA both decrease cancer cell proliferation, and
both inhibit the activity of epigenetic enzymes.
Epigeneticists believe that is far from being a coincidence. →→ DNA methyltransferase
enzymes add a methyl group to the cytidine base. Higher concentrations of this
base are found in the long CG-rich stretches of DNA known as CpG island is heavily methylated, the gene controlled by that
promoter is switched off. In other words. DNA methylation is a repressive modification.
DNMT activity increased DNA methylation and therefore represses gene expression.
By inhibiting these enzymes with 5-azacytidine, we can drive gene expression
up.
Histone protein are also found at the promoters of genes. Histone acetylation
is the most straightforward in terms of its effects on gene expression. If the histones
upstream of a gene are heavily
acetylated, the gene is likely to be
highly expressed. If the histones are lacking acetylation, the gene is
likely to be switched off. Histone deacetylation
is a repressive change. Histone deacetylases (HDACs) remove the acetyl groups from
histone protein and will therefore repress gene expression. By inhibiting the
enzymes with SAHA, we can drive gene expression up.
Cancer
biology 101
Cancer is the result of abnormal and uncontrolled proliferation of cells. Normally, the cells of our
body divide and proliferate at exactly the right rate. This is controlled by a
complex balancing act between networks of genes in our cells. Certain genes
promote cell proliferation. These are sometimes referred to as proto-oncogenes. They were represented
by a plus sign in the see-saw diagram fig
10.5
Other genes hold the cell back, preventing too much proliferation. These
genes are called tumor suppressors. Represented by a negative sign on the same
diagram.
Cancer cells divide too often, they are also abnormal and can start
to invade other tissue. →→ the more of these moles or polys you have, the
greater the likelihood that one of them will go next step, and develop an abnormality
that will take it further along the path towards full-brown cancer. →→→ cancer is a multi-step process. →→→ cells accumulate
defects as they move increasingly close to becoming cancerous. These defects must be transmitted from other
cell to daughter cell,
Two copies of each tumor suppressor gene. →→ cell becomes
increasingly cancerous, both copies of key tumor suppressor genes usually get
switched off(inactivated)→ these is called somatic mutations to distinguish them
from genetic mutations, the one that are transmitted from parent to child.
If the DNA at the promoter becomes excessively methylated or the
histones are covered in repressive modifications, the tumor suppressor will be
switched off. The gene has been inactivated without changing the underlying
blueprint.
The epigenetic
frontier in cancer.
Clear cell renal carcinoma→→→ inactivation of a specific
tumor suppressor gene called VHL→→ analyze the CpG island in front of the VHL
gene. the DNA of the island was
hypermethylated.
BRCA1 tumor suppressor gene in breast cancer. Which no mutation in BRCA1 → BRCA1 CpG island
was hypermethylated.
The histones associated with t tumor suppressor gene called ARH1 had
low levels of acetylation in breast cancer. →→ a similar relationship exists
for the PER1 tumor suppressor in a form of lung cancer called non-small cell. →→
in both cases, there was a relationship between the levels of histone acetylation
and the expression of the tumor suppressor – the lower the levels of
acetylation, the lower the expression of the gene. →→→ because these genes are
both tumor suppressors, their decreased expression would mean that the cell
would find it harder to put the brakes on proliferation.
Tumor suppressor genes are often silence by epigenetic mechanisms. →→→
creates a new way of treating cancer. Tumor suppressor genes back on in cancer
cells, there is a fighting chance of reining in the crazy proliferation rate of
those cells.
Gene therapy when tumor suppressor were inactivated by mutations of deletions.
Gene therapy →→ very difficult to get the genes delivered into the right cells.
Relatively rare cases where the gene therapy itself has led to cancer, expensive
and difficult. →→ that’s why there is so much excitement about the development
of epigenetic drugs to treat cancer.
Two drug that inhibit the DNMT1 enzyme are 5 azacytidine and 2-aza-5 deoxycytidine. →→ two HDAC inhibitors
have also been licensed. →→→ SAHA and
romidepsin
Stop looking
for miracles
DNMT1 inhibitors and HDAC inhibitors seem to rein in the cancer cell
growth, retarding and repressing it. They control
rather than cure.
No easy
wins
Fig11.3 →→ repressive histone modifications attract DNA
methyltransferases, which deposit DNA methylation near those histones. →→ this
methylation in turn attract more repressive histone modifying enzymes, creating
a self perpetuating cycle 못 lead to an increasingly
hostile region for gene expression.
Repressive histone modifications can act as the bait to attract DNA
methylation to the promoter of a tumor suppressor gene. A key example of this is an epigenetic
enzyme we met in the previous chapter, called EZH2. →→ The EZH2 protein adds
methyl groups to the lysine amino acid
at position 27 on histone H3. This amino acid is known as H3K27.
An uneasy
truce
Most evolutionary pressures are connected with the drive to leave behind as many offspring as possible. For a human
to reach reproductive age, it’s incredibly important that early development occur
as efficiently as possible. After all, you can’’t reproduce if you never make
it past the embryo stage. Once we’ve reached reproductive age and had the
opportunity to reproduce, there is little to be gained in evolutionary terms in
us staying alive for several decades afterwards.
Regulatory systems that allow
cells to be flexible are inevitable also systems that allow cells to go wrong. →→ in evolutionary terms, it’s the price we have to pay for our
Goldilocks scenario. →→ our epigenetic pathways make sure some of our cells
aren’t completely pluripotent or completely differentiated. Instead, they are
just right, hovering somewhere near the top of Waddington’s epigenetic landscape,
but ready to roll down at any time.
No comments:
Post a Comment